Suchergebnisse
Filter
31 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Information technology in a democracy
In: Harvard studies in technology and society
World Affairs Online
The centers of power: three cases in American national government
In: A Harbrace casebook in political science
Intrusions: privacy tradeoffs in a free society
In: The public perspective: a Roper Center review of public opinion and polling, Band 11, Heft 6, S. 8-19
ISSN: 1050-5067
The Judicial Mind: Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Glendon R. Schubert. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1965. Pp. 288, index. $10.00.) - Judicial Behavior: A Reader in Theory and Research. Glendon R. Schubert. (Chicago: Rand McNally and Co., 1964. Pp. 5...
In: American political science review, Band 61, Heft 3, S. 763-764
ISSN: 1537-5943
Anti-communism & the corporations
In: Commentary, Band 36, S. 479-487
ISSN: 0010-2601
The John Birch society: fundamentalism on the right [based on address]
In: Commentary, Band 32, S. 93-104
ISSN: 0010-2601
Shorter version printed in: Social Action 28:11-28 Mr '62.
Law and Opinion in England in the Twentieth Century. By Morris Ginsberg. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959. Pp. viii, 406. $6.50.)
In: American political science review, Band 54, Heft 3, S. 745-745
ISSN: 1537-5943
Wiretapping: the quiet revolution
In: Commentary, Band 29, S. 333-340
ISSN: 0010-2601
The Supreme Court and Group Conflict: Thoughts on Seeing Burke Put Through the Mill
In: American political science review, Band 52, Heft 3, S. 665-677
ISSN: 1537-5943
In the fashion of fellow Young Burkes who are challenging liberal folkways in areas from civil-military relations to free speech, Albert Mavrinac offers here a prescription for Supreme Court supervision of group conflict in America. At the outset, it is fitting to pay tribute to his intellectual fortitude. To embrace Lucifer, Lochner v. New York, and, in the same article, to condemn St. Joan, Brown v. Board of Education (in the latter case virtually in the midst of the beatification ceremonies), and to strike this stance in the presence of a constitutional law fraternity strong in its liberal piety—this is indeed a profile in academic courage. I take it that my assignment as commentator in this Review is to discuss what there is besides courage to support his revisionist credo.My initial reaction was that Mavrinac had written an interesting essay about wisdom for legislators: it hardly seemed possible that an analysis of judicial standards should lack discussion of the integrity of the judicial process itself and focus so sharply on extra-court considerations. Having persuaded myself that a consistent theory of judicial review must lie in the interstices of the argument, I re-read it.
The supreme court and group conflict: thoughts on seeing burke put through the mill
In: American political science review, Band 52, Heft 3, S. 665-677
ISSN: 0003-0554